🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states employed their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final solution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the identical language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this attack."